My first impulse was ... "Terrific ... given the horrendous way that fundamentalists treat their women, giving weapons to an anonymous person who happens to be female may be a blessing in disguise. The "government-issued" burqas all look alike because they are.Now she can defend herself and her children against massive testosterone explosions at home and in the souk ... and her anonymity can be preserved."
I decided to do some research about this report and found an article in the UK's Telegraph:
This took me to research "Umm Layth" the nom-de-blog of a female English speaking jihadi in the UK.
If it is still online and you are willing to risk blemishing your here-to-for blue-white-red record for keeping your eyes on corporate media, you will find, of course, basic fundamentalist rhetoric; substitute your name for your god, your paradise, your holy effort, your miserable existence on this plane ... etc.
Here is the call to the emotions ...
"Our claim for Al Wala Wal Bara is fake if we do not externally and internally hate for the sake of Allah the one who tarnishes the image of Islam, the one who takes allies with the Kuffar and denounces the main pillars of Islam including Jihad, even if this very person is the one gave birth to us or just our blood in general. Wallahi in Islam, there is no importance to Blood ties over ties over Din. Being angry for the sake of Allah swt is part of our Islam, part of our Aqeedah [The belief system that is based upon a firm conviction in all the fundamentals of faith and of the Oneness of Allah, i.e. creed], part of our eeman [faith], and part of tassawuf [inner, mystical dimension of Islam]."
As the Telegraph article notes, beyond the fundamentalist rhetoric quoted from sources, including shaiks, the blog also includes "typical" comments by the age group (18 - 24) that could be made by even the most hip socialite or "valley girl" in another culture. For example, there is a post from "anonymous" who requests that a photo on the page, ostensibly of the author, be removed because it belong to "anonymous". Despite the author's willingness to sacrifice "the one who gave birth to us", there's a mother's day tribute.
The blog clearly states that the recruited women aren't mindless and many are very educated. Makes sense ... how can one bend the mind of a mindless being?
Beyond the hate speech, however, is the actual role for which women are being armed: marrying jihadi men. Marginalized into a police force and actually not on the front lines, they are given tasts to keep fundamentalist women in place. It is no different than the kapos recruited by the Nazis in work and death camps from among prisoners to keep the condemned in line.
Does it make sense to give hidden women a gun during "that time of the month"? Girlfriend ... if you really want to feel powerful ... see who is willing to take out your trash every four weeks.
I certainly hope this posting, and my research, will not make me lose the precious, incidental, TSA preCheck status ... but we don't live in simple times. I am intrigued.
Just because you are/not paranoid doesn't mean that you aren't being followed. Thanks, George Bush!